Argendon Sandidry Elite 80C review
Argendon Sandidry Elite 80C research review covering specifications and installation fit, with unresolved airflow, clearance and owner-evidence limits.
Elite80C has a documented 80-pint rating at stated conditions, but duplicated owner texts prevent a strong ownership recommendation.
At a Glance
Manufacturer image · Argendon
KEY FEATURES
- 80 pints/day at 80°F / 60% RH
- 8-inch wheels, push-pull handle and integrated cord/hose storage
- Built-in pump and gravity drainage
- Digital RH/GPP controls, automatic defrost and power-memory restart
Editorial assessment
Research-based conclusions · manufacturer documents and attributed owner reports
Moisture control
Capacity conditions are explicit
The sheet separates 80 pints/day at 80°F/60% RH from 170 at 90°F/90% RH. Neither is a daily-output guarantee in your basement.
Drainage usability
Options established; outcomes limited
Pump and gravity drainage are documented. Owner texts overlapping Elite50C cannot establish exact-80C pump reliability.
Installation & service access
Check the whole cabinet journey
Published weight and height matter for stairs and service. Clarify the conflicting clearances and airflow unit before planning a constrained position.
Running-cost evidence
No measured efficiency ranking
The documented capacity basis does not supply a comparable energy result. Pooled listing reviews cannot establish lower running costs.
These are editorial judgments, not measured performance scores or customer stars. Read the supporting analysis.
PROS
- Capacity is stated at explicit temperature and RH conditions.
CONS
- Owner texts overlap Elite50C and cannot support independent model outcomes.
- Heavy upright form and unresolved clearance matter for access.
- Airflow unit requires clarification.
Price and availability subject to change
Elite80C’s sheet separates 80 pints/day at 80°F/60% RH from 170 at 90°F/90% RH.
That is useful for comparing rating conditions. It is not a prediction that your basement will yield 80 pints every day.
Check the cabinet journey as well as the capacity
The published 63.05-pound weight and 26.85-inch height belong in the access discussion before wheels are treated as a benefit. Consider stairs, thresholds and space for service. No handling trial here establishes that this cabinet is manageable on a particular route.
- Clearance: the inspected family manual gives conflicting distances; obtain exact-model clarification.
- Airflow: the page’s unit is inconsistent; do not silently convert it to a confident CFM figure.
The owner total does not settle either question
The Elite80C listing repeats or shortens accounts found on Elite50C. The detailed analysis explains the attribution problem. Those texts do not establish exact-80C quietness, setup ease or pump reliability, and a seven-review total does not turn them into seven independent observations of this model.
Use the stated capacity basis to decide whether further investigation is relevant.
- Use corrected installation documentation to decide whether the machine can go in the proposed space.
- Keep both decisions separate from the still-limited ownership assessment.
Pros & Cons Analysis
Research sources and limitations are described in this review.
Pros
The exact sheet separates the 80°F/60% RH rating from the saturation-style headline.
This makes the capacity comparison more interpretable, while leaving real basement performance dependent on conditions.
Cons
The duplicated listing corpus is excluded from exact-model experience conclusions.
Its average star score would not cure that attribution problem.
Published weight and height must be checked with the access route.
Conflicting manual clearances prevent approving a constrained footprint from cabinet dimensions alone.
An inconsistent airflow unit cannot be converted into a confident CFM specification without clarification.
We leave it unresolved instead of importing a similar model’s value.
Separate the capacity case from the installation gaps
A document-based option
Keep Elite80C as a document-based option for a suitable accessible space, with a useful stated capacity basis.
Resolve the installation gaps
Resolve clearances and airflow and obtain attributable owner evidence before treating it as a strongly recommended basement purchase.
Stars do not settle the choice
Its listing stars do not establish superiority over Elite60C.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the 170-pint headline apply at 80°F and 60% RH?
No. The sheet gives 80 pints/day at those conditions and 170 at 90°F/90% RH.
Why not use all seven owner reports?
Their overlap with Elite50C prevents confident exact-model attribution.
Technical Specifications
| Removal capacity at 80°F / 60% RH | 80 pints/day at 80°F / 60% RH |
|---|---|
| Advertised saturation capacity | 170 pints/day at 90°F / 90% RH |
| Drainage options | Gravity or built-in pump |
| Built-in condensate pump | Yes |
| Documented pump lift | 19.6 ft vertical claim in exact 60C/80C sheet; route conditions need confirmation |
| Humidity control type | Digital control advertised |
| Selectable humidity settings | 35–90% RH published |
| Remote control support | Not verified for this exact edition |
| Unit dimensions (L × W × H) | 16.14 × 15.15 × 26.85 in on sheet |
| Unit weight | 63.05 lb sheet; page rounds 63.1 |
| Required airflow clearance | Family manual conflicts: 6 ft/36 in in one section versus 6 in in another; unresolved |
| Rated airflow | Unresolved: product table uses inconsistent unit |
| Stated operating temperature | 37.4–100.4°F |
| Power supply | 110–120 V |
| Rated current | Current not verified; published power 576 W |
| Published efficiency metric | Manufacturer COP 2.74 L/kWh; not verified IEF |
| Published sound pressure | Not verified for this exact edition |
| Filter rating | Not verified for this exact edition |
| Refrigerant | Not verified for this exact edition |
| Warranty coverage | Headline coverage is not a verified parts/labor/exclusions schedule |
| Independently checked certification | Exact-model independent registry match not completed |
